Prelim / Products / AI Evaluation
Grade the answers a rubric can't.
Prelim's assessors read long-form responses, code, and case work the way a senior reviewer would — scoring reasoning, not keywords.
Reasoning-aware, inconsistency-catching.
AI Evaluation scores open-ended work against your rubric and catches inconsistency across a candidate's whole session — surfacing anomalies for a human to confirm rather than auto-rejecting.
- Long-form response and case-work grading
- Inconsistency detection across the session
- Human-in-the-loop review of flags
- Evidence-linked scores you can defend
88.9%scoring accuracy vs. benchmark
Measured against expert human panels across 60+ types.
What it does.
AI interviewer
Adaptive, conversational assessment at scale.
Inconsistency flags
Anomalies surfaced for human review, not auto-reject.
Explainable scores
Every score traces to specific evidence.
Questions teams ask us.
No. Every score links to the response, the rubric, and the benchmark, so it's reviewable and defensible.
Yes. Integrity and inconsistency signals are surfaced for a human to confirm.
50+ types, including embedded images, tables, and handwritten notes.
See AI evaluation on your hardest questions.
Bring a real open-ended exercise and we'll score it live.