Products / AI Evaluation

Grade the answers a rubric can't.

Prelim's assessors read long-form responses, code, and case work the way a senior reviewer would — scoring reasoning, not keywords.

How it works

Reasoning-aware, inconsistency-catching.

AI Evaluation scores open-ended work against your rubric and catches inconsistency across a candidate's whole session — surfacing anomalies for a human to confirm rather than auto-rejecting.

  • Long-form response and case-work grading
  • Inconsistency detection across the session
  • Human-in-the-loop review of flags
  • Evidence-linked scores you can defend
88.9%
scoring accuracy vs. benchmark

Measured against expert human panels across 60+ types.

Capabilities

What it does.

AI interviewer

Adaptive, conversational assessment at scale.

Inconsistency flags

Anomalies surfaced for human review, not auto-reject.

Explainable scores

Every score traces to specific evidence.

FAQ

Questions teams ask us.

Is grading a black box?+

No. Every score links to the response, the rubric, and the benchmark, so it's reviewable and defensible.

Does a human stay in the loop?+

Yes. Integrity and inconsistency signals are surfaced for a human to confirm.

What file types can it read?+

50+ types, including embedded images, tables, and handwritten notes.

See AI evaluation on your hardest questions.

Bring a real open-ended exercise and we'll score it live.